Archive for the 'start-ups' Category

Presslayer: there is a new Curious Office project in town

I’m really excited about our newest project that we are incubating internally codenamed “Presslayer”. The concept was developed completely in-house by us and, like Imagekind, I will initially lead the development of the concept and the recruiting of the initial team. Adrian Hanauer and Imagekind CFO Tom Riley are kindly providing support in their own way too. I think we were all reasonably pleased with the Imagekind outcome but in many ways, I’m honestly more excited about this new project than any other I’ve worked on before because:

A) I can’t believe nobody is doing this yet and;
B) We have a great base of investors, co-founders, developers and business partners to draw on right out of the gate

I can’t say a lot about Presslayer just yet. The market is big. The need is obvious. If we could just “snap our fingers” such that the platform just magically appeared in our lap I have no doubt that thousands of designers and marketers would use the system to make their jobs easier.

If you are a developer, product manager or marketing manager anxious to build a leading online community, please don’t hesitate to contact me at kelly@curiousoffice.com

Like last time, Presslayer will be partially funded by Curious Office. Once we finalize on the rest of the development co-founders and the other investors I’ll share more on this blog. This is an exciting time…that moment when you go from concept to a talented team of people all working to bring that idea to fruition. I’ve been fortunate enough to have been through this a few times and we’re sure that you will love what we are up to.

Stay tuned please!!

Kelly

How to build a start-up

I found myself saying this today and I realized it is the shortest way to state the truth.

You must do twice as much.
Twice as good.
With half as much resources.
In half as much time.

No. I’m not kidding. This really does summarize my experience. You can go ahead and read between the lines to flesh out some of the less obvious things that make all of the above possible. For example, how can you do twice as much in half the time if you don’t have an unusual ability to be good at several different crafts that (would otherwise) require twice as many people in a “normal” organization? In a start-up, for example, there is no place for a CEO who is not at least exceptional at most marketing disciplines OR is exceptional at shipping high quality products that people like to use. Preferably, the CEO has an uncanny knack at both of those things. Similarly, there is no place in a start-up for a marketing exec who can’t actually execute on his or her own ideas. If you have to send all copy writing and creative out to a firm, how does that help the start-up do twice as much on half the budget? I’m not a big fan of start-up ceo’s and execs who are only capable of being strategists. Being good at strategy is a necessity. An assumption. Being able to do all the other tactical things well within the confines of massive constraint is basically the key. If you’re one of those few, you just might have a shot. Just remember that gravity will always conspire against you in the process. Gravity doesn’t want start-ups to succeed. That’s why most do not. And that’s the last thought I have on this start-up founder question. If you give up at the same point where “normal” people give up, you’ll wind up being another unhappy statistic.

Look who closed a Series A!

Wishpot closes Series A financing

It’s been awhile since my last blog post and in fact this week I’m in Hawaii. But, I wanted to congratulate Max and Alexis over at Wishpot on the closing of their round. As a side note, I got a chance to meet with another firm involved in this project - H Farm in Italy. Very cool company, nice guys and beautiful work.

Famous Sand Hill Road

Sand Hill Road

Traveling down in the Valley today! Oh, you can feel the energy in the air…

Zappos: Anatomy of a success story

Zappos

How is this for revenue growth? The best way to finance a company? Revenue.

* 1999: Almost nothing
* 2000: $ 1.6 mm
* 2001: $ 8.6 mm
* 2002: $ 32 mm
* 2003: $ 70 mm
* 2004: $184 mm
* 2005: $370 mm
* 2006: $597 mm
* 2007: $840 mm
* 2008: Over $1 billion (goal)

New business research at Linkedin

Linkedin

LinkedIn, with help from BusinessWeek’s CapitalIQ, has added a company directory and research information to its business network. For now, it seems you can only get to this directory through Linkedin. You have to get to the directory through individual user profiles and the Linkedin blog explains more on this process. At the moment, there are 160,000 companies in the database. The Linkedin demo video does a decent job explaining how you would access and benefit from this new feature.



Linkedin has always been a great tool for recruiters and start-ups looking to find new staff. Being able to do more background information on the companies behind the individuals seems to be of obvious value.

Outsourced phone systems for start-ups

I noticed some email traffic going about within the Seattle start-up community last week regarding outsourced PBX phone systems that might be appropriate for start-ups. Having struggled with Asterisk ourselves at Imagekind for well over a year, I knew this discussion was going to be very valuable for someone. Here’s the summary of that thread from last week.

http://www.asterisk.org/
Generally too complicated to bother with.

http://www.accessline.com/
Comments about being unhappy with this service.

http://angel.com/
“Point and click interface for everything. Angel does everything…”

http://gotvmail.com
Generally good feedback.

http://ringcentral.com
“It does everything we need and it is very cost effective.”

http://www.switchvox.com/
Generally good feedback.

Work ethic of a start-up

Whew. By now most of the blog sphere will have been aware of this post by 37Signals which details how the firm is experimenting with a 4 day work week. The logic being that employee satisfaction is higher and people come back more refreshed after a nice long 3 day weekend.

Nearly simultaneously was a email thread going around on the organize@seattletechstartups.com mailing list on the very same subject. The discussion got heated. Some said that if you want a nice, relaxing work experience then you aren’t cut out for a start-up. Others maintained that this position is arrogant, unrealistic and dated. I haven’t seen a good email flame war in a while but I could easily understand both positions.

At Imagekind, my first developer was a very hard worker. She showed up promptly at 9am when most other devs preferred to get started around 10am. She worked all throughout the day and never left for lunch. She would also begin packing up around 5:30 pretty consistently. I knew that when she was in the office she got more done than anyone else and there was no question about it. From the very beginning, I had discussed that she could work from home every Thursday. Like all great devs, she had other employment options. Allowing her to work from home one day per week was a creative perk that we could offer as a fledgling start-up. There was a huge amount of mutual respect, admiration and trust between us and I never felt that she wasn’t giving 100% while she was home on Thursday. Her instant messenger would light up promptly at 9am each day.

There are different expectations for employees than there are for co-founders. I don’t expect employees to work the same amount of hours that I do. Frankly, I’m on email pretty much all the time and I work most weekends. But, employees are different. What I do expect is that employees are incredibly talented at what they do. And I expect that they are not disruptive in the office. They need to work well with others and I’ve made the mistake of hiring incredibly smart people would were also incredibly abrasive. It never works. I don’t really care if someone wants to work from 11am-7pm. Or 9am-5:30pm. It just doesn’t matter. Where it falls apart is when the situation is abused. In my experience though, it is possible to communicate up front that this freedom and flexibility is offered because you generally care about the well being and happiness of the people who come to work every day. I want them to be happy that they came to help us realize our dreams. I want them to feel appreciated. And I tell them that I appreciate them every day. I’ve found then when you structure your work environment around a sincere desire to make an employee truly happy about working with you then they will give so much more back to the organization. When it all comes together, there is no discussion about the work week because each is trying hard to make the other happy.

If someone went above and beyond to help us hit a milestone I’d ask them to work from home after lunch.
If someone wasn’t feeling well and I could see it I’d ask them if they wanted to leave a little early.
If someone was having a difficult personal struggle I’d tell them to work from home and just leave instant messenger on.
If someone was having a hard time solving a problem I’d take them to lunch.

All of these things probably seem obvious. But, in the end, we all felt that we worked hard enough each day and there wasn’t a need to ask someone to work harder.

Having said all of this, I admit that I made mistakes. The biggest mistake I made was that I subconsciously provided this kind of attention primarily to developers and I don’t believe that I extended the same level of courtesy to all the employees right down to the temporary folk who helped us on non-technical issues. It’s easy to show favoritism and not be aware of it. In retrospect, I would have treated everyone the same but I didn’t realize at the time how much preference devs were getting compared to others. It turned out others noticed before I did.

The Feb Seattle Startup Index

The latest Seattle Startup Index maintained by Marcelo Calbucci at Sampa shows three Curious Office companies in the top 20. That’s pretty cool.

Our own Imagekind comes in at 20 with a blended Alexa/Compete rank of 18,173.
Shelfari comes in with a blended ranking of 13,018.
SEOmoz has a blended ranking of 3,756!

Obviously one could debate the exact value and meaning of these numbers but it does illustrate real visitor interest in the offerings as well as an advanced knowledge of site and search optimization by the top companies who rank highly. It isn’t an easy thing to master but it ultimately comes down to having a valuable product that a reasonable number of people care about!

Start-up marketing

A few days ago I had the pleasure of sitting with the VP Marketing of a well known, established technology company in Seattle that everyone would know. The firm is a leader in their field and is backed by some of the wealthiest individuals on the planet. She was interested in how we marketed Imagekind, gained traction with users, artists and press. She had been telling me how the company was working on a variety of email campaigns, direct mail pieces and other traditional marketing components. This particular marketing executive was high energy, experienced and a master of the craft.

But there was something interesting about this particular conversation…

What seemed like a “natural” marketing strategy in at least one respect for Imagekind wasn’t at all an area of active participation for this established company.

SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING

With all new start-ups, you have a limited budget, limited staff and a myriad of other constraints. In our case, there was not going to be any direct mail pieces or large PR budgets until we mastered the art of social media marketing. It is necessary for several reasons. First, it is important to figure out how to get others to understand why they should have a vested interest in your success. Additionally, it is most helpful to have your customers and partners develop a vested interest in your success. Finally, it is your network of users that are your most efficient QA and testing resource.

In a nutshell, social media marketing should be the most important marketing priority for start-ups before moving into other areas. Even big companies are now realizing that they need to staff up for these kinds of positions. So, start-ups need to insure that they are present and accounted for when it comes to the free-flowing discussions moving around the web.

Ben Wills did a decent job of trying to encapsulate what Social Media Marketing was all about with his so-called “5 Pillars“. All to often though, and unfortunately, is that buzzy nomenclature is used to describe otherwise common sense concepts. He calls the pillars:

1. Declaration of Identity
2. Identity through Association
3. User-initiated Conversation
4. Provider-initiated Conversation
5. In-Person Interaction

I tend to like to say things plainly. Social media marketing allows you to:

1. Better tell the world who you are and what your purpose and intent is
2. Provides a basis for those with your interests to associate themselves with you
3. Assumes you accept that business is about a two-way conversation with your customers
4. Expand your ability to initiate your own conversations with customers
5. Provides a great platform to get face to face with your customers at events

And herein lies the mystery for me. Why would a marketing veteran NOT place this kind of marketing at the top of their priority list in all cases? Why is a direct mail campaign more interesting than engaging online dialog with your customers and prospects? The answer is simply that things are perhaps not as intuitive as they may seem. Most VP’s of Marketing still aren’t blogging and the ones that do probably weren’t doing it 2 years ago. Thus, traditional marketers are still trying to fully embrace what it is all about. Before allocating your marketing budget, hiring a PR firm, sending out any direct mail, paying designers to develop slick brochures, engaging in product give-aways and hiring celebrities to endorse your product, these are the questions that should be answered first:

“Where on the internet do my constituents congregate”?
“Am I regularly involved in the conversations with them at these sites”?
“Do I understand what my online reputation is”?
“Do I have an online reputation”?
“Do I know how to alter my reputation to better reflect what we want it to be”?
“Do I know how search engines are treating me”?
“Do I have an army of invested customers helping us row the boat towards our goals”?
“Do customers understand what is in it for them if they embrace our vision work help us communicate it”?
“Do we have sufficient resources and budget to maintain timely conversations online”?
“Do you ‘own the airwaves’ in your sector vis a vis your competitors”?
“Have we identified the key influentials out there that can help us get more traction”?
“Do we accept that a stay-at-home-soccermom can be far more powerful than a celebrity for our company”?
“Do we realize that a blog is not a toy? It is our customer sounding board and we must take it seriously”?
“Do we accept that PR firms do not define our identity”? Customers words do that

Social media marketing is a slightly fancy way of saying that we accept that modern day marketing is first and foremost about the importance of two-way communication.

Forget fancy brochures. They don’t talk back. Instead, prepare to get dirty. Spend more time online talking and less time putting stamps on direct mail. When it is all going really well, a lot of people will write about you and say nice things. A lot of people will even link to you from their websites. Then journalists will take note of this movement and will write about you too. All of this behavior should then correspond to increasing interest and that will correspond to sales. Knowing how to adjust the levers of online reputation, knowing how to track it and knowing how those actions influence revenue is essentially the cornerstone of online marketing in this day and age. Even for established companies.

Get yourself funded

Why Isn’t There A Network or Hub Connecting Venture Capitalists With Startups? Well that’s just the question that AsktheVC tried to answer with this blog post. The article was interesting but the comments suggested a few links that I thought readers might be interested in. Know of other companies that connect investors to entrepreneurs? Send them to me and I’ll post them.

Check out:

http://www.gobignetwork.com
http://www.fundability.com/
http://www.fundinguniverse.com./
http://www.younoodle.com./

Seattle’s most influential bloggers?

Well at least I can’t say I’ve never been nominated for something. Thanks to Marcelo Calbucci, the founder of Sampa and the driver behind the Seattle 2.0 blog for pulling together the top blogs in the Seattle market. Great idea Marcelo! Gonna Digg it!

University of Washington: Creating a Company

John R. Castle is the Lecturer in Entrepreneurship at the Michael G. Foster School of Business over at University of Washington. I shared some slides with him which he’s going to use in some of his materials and he shared the course overview that he is teaching titled “Creating a Company“. This looks to be a really great class. Might be of interest to some readers?

Click here to download the course description in PDF format.

SEO whitepaper for WordPress

Just tripped over this over at http://weblogtoolscollection.com/. Might be a worthy read for anyone interested to learn the basics of SEO for Wordpress.

Carrie Hill and Mary Bowling of Blizzard Internet Marketing has released a WordPess SEO Whitepaper that is available for free in PDF form. The white paper goes over the usual suspects such as the use of pretty permalinks, SEO Plugins and socializing your blog. The whitepaper also gives quite a few tips and tricks to help configure your WordPress powered blog so that it is SEO friendly from the get-go. This is an excellent read for those that are brand new to WordPress or for those curious to know what they could do to improve the SEO on their own blogs.

Go download the SEO whitepaper for WordPress.

The value of “strategic intuition”

Lately I’ve been thinking a lot about intuition and its immense - yet hard to quantify characteristic. Intuition, I suppose, is generally understood to be the counter point to a more analytical decision making process. This theory of the “left brain/right brain” structure and functions of the mind suggests that the two different sides of the brain control two different “modes” of thinking. It also suggests that each of us prefers one mode over the other. By now, most of us already know the personality types.

  • Left brain:
    • Logical
    • Sequential
    • Rational
    • Analytical
    • Objective
    • Looks at parts

    Right brain:

    • Random
    • Intuitive
    • Holistic
    • Synthesizing
    • Subjective
    • Looks at wholes

    In exceptional cases, the world comes to know of Steve Jobs, Larry Page, Sergey Brin and others who certainly seem left-brained in that they are uncommonly analytical but also seem to possess a strong intuition that allows them to channel huge amounts of corporate resources towards large problems and “be right” more often than not. And, making high quality decisions more often than not is really what separates the players from the rest. I’d like to argue, in fact, that strategic insight is more important than being a world class technologist as it relates to web start-ups. It has been said that Seattle could compete with the Silicon Valley more effectively if only we could increase the scope and sophistication of our technology education paradigm. Having a richer technology education environment seems as important to a budding tech scene as cocoa does to chocolate cake. It’s important! Technologists (e.g. developers/computer scientists) may well be the perfect “catalysts” for the next great online businesses.

    Having said that, I’m still apt to argue that past the seed stage, a broader ability to think reigns supreme. In order to be more “whole-brained” in their orientation, budding tech entrepreneurs should try to take from their schooling equal appreciation for the arts, creativity, and the skills of imagination and synthesis. It would seem that businesses become great when all cylinders are firing in uncanny sequence and with above average efficiency. This includes development, marketing, sales and support.

    I think intuition is sometimes confused by observers as “luck.” Two interesting, albeit relatively small, examples come to mind. First, was the widely publicized story of the 21 year old who started a site after a few hours of brainstorming called http://www.milliondollarhomepage.com The idea was simple and caught on like wildfire. Basically, he set up a site and intended to sell “pixel ads” until he had made a million dollars. The goal was achieved in months. The second company that came to mind as I wrote this was the now famous “AmIHotOrNot” site. These two sites, along with so many other similar examples (like Twitter, Pownce, digg and others) were conceived as either sudden flashes of inspiration or as a subconscious analysis of past experience. For example, it is highly unlikely that the first time Kevin Rose of Digg pulled up his favorite news site that he immediately noticed obvious problems. In fact, he probably noticed nothing at all. More likely, he spent years consuming information from existing websites and grew accustomed to clicking around to get to the information HE was most interested in. We do it with the giant Sunday edition newspaper each week. I grab the business section and my wife quickly goes for the editorial or entertainment portions.

    In the case of the milliondollarhome page, Alex had already amassed enough knowledge about the internet, online advertising and traffic building subconsciously that he had already begun to lay the foundation for a totally original online ad platform even before he realized the idea for the site. He just didn’t know that this consumption and storage of information would yield opportunity or he did not know how the opportunity would manifest itself.

    Intuition is like that. When good ideas bubble up, you’ll often be sitting in traffic or you’ll dream about it in your sleep. It may seem like an epiphany but it is really the outward manifestation of your brains ability to manage thousands of seemingly unrelated data points and reinterpret them according to what it thinks you really want. I really believe that embracing and extending the power of strategic intuition is perhaps the most important leverage you could exercise.

    There are a lot of reasons why investors often like to see technologists paired with a right brained marketing type. It isn’t that a developer can’t read marketing books and learn how to build a SWOT analysis or an MRD. Many developers who start companies do it because they are interested in learning more about business on the front lines. “Why do people buy products and how did they come to make the decision?” But from my observation, there is something else that a right brained marketer brings to the table beyond his mastery of the marketing basics. It is intuition. It is “presence of mind,” where you free your brain of all preconceptions about what problem you’re solving and what solution might work. Some people have certainly learned it on their own, without even knowing what exactly they’re doing. But like all other complex human actions, you are born without it and over time your brain learns it.

    Leveraging a highly cultivated strategic intuition ability is perhaps an entrepreneur’s best marketing strategy. When you embrace presence of mind you accept the incredible power of the mind and its ability to reach into its file cabinet to deliver the information you need to make good decisions in the face of ambiguity. Left brained people often struggle when challenged to find clarity in ambiguous situations just as right brained people often struggle to articulate a product spec with the right amount coherent detail which satisfactorily captures the importance, goals and non-goals of the envisioned feature.

    When I worked for RealNetworks in the 90’s, I had the opportunity to go to work in Europe during a time when there was no infrastructure yet in place. With all of Europe before us and little tactical direction to draw on, we had to make some critical decisions. “Where shall we focus on resources? On what verticals? In what countries?” I recall spending some preliminary time in the Nordic regions, hopping from Sweden to Finland to Denmark. Along the way, I wasn’t particularly trying to address the more strategic questions that related to an overall direction. I sensed opportunity based on a few brief emails and phone calls. Each subsequent meeting in the region confirmed the sense I had. I wasn’t rigid in my development of a sales plan. I didn’t believe I knew enough about Europe to be rigid. Over time, I began to develop some observations. The first was, “I like this area. It’s like Seattle in many ways with the water, climate and smaller urban topographies.” Further sub conscientious notations were made. “The people here seem particularly aggressive about digital media and its potential relative to some of the other regions I’ve visited.” “The people here seem to admire the possibility of an American business cooperation more so than in other regions.” “The people here seem to embrace the idea of risk in a manner that is more American and more along lines that I understand.” “The people here want their English to sound more American.”

    All of these things went into the mental file cabinet. What came out was a bit of a business plan to spend time and money marketing to nordic telecoms. What also came out was a good deal of revenue. Working with former executives from Microsoft, I can tell you that making decisions based on “gut instinct” isn’t always a popular explanation. If there aren’t bar charts and analyst reports to support your theories you’ll often find yourself chastised in this technology industry. Yet, at the end of the day what’s truly admirable is your ability to analyze a much wider range and depth of information than would be considered “normal” and infuse that with a “sixth sense” that cannot possibility be constrained to an excel spreadsheet. When things can’t be quantified in a spreadsheet, many people get nervous. That would be a mistake. This goes to the heart of the value of a right brained individual in an organization.

    Presence of mind means accepting that even the most minute details are used to craft valuable epiphanies. Accepting the epiphanies that often come as a “flash” of insight feels like an overwhelming discovery of opportunity. Your resolution to act on flashes of insight is obviously necessary. I can only speak for myself. I tend to develop packaging, presentation, marketing and PR strategies with intuition being an important pillar in the framing of the plan. “I just know” what will work best is an extremely important sense to be able to cultivate and very few people will want to state “I just know” with the right level of confidence. In the end though, “I’ll just do it” is the only manifestation of intuition that really matters.