<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things better explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.curiousoffice.com/2007/11/22/things-better-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.curiousoffice.com/2007/11/22/things-better-explained/</link>
	<description>A Seattle-based seed stage investment and technology development organization.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kalid</title>
		<link>http://www.curiousoffice.com/2007/11/22/things-better-explained/#comment-176479</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curiousoffice.com/2007/11/22/things-better-explained/#comment-176479</guid>
		<description>Hi all, thanks for the writeup. Yes, I'm a believer that anything can be explained in simple, everyday terms. If something is presented in a complicated way, it's often because the explainer doesn't understand it well enough. Also there's a need to empathize with your audience -- the Wikipedia entry is factually accurate, but way too detailed for 99% of the intended audience. Unfortunately most topics (especially math) are explained as expert-to-expert, not expert-to-beginner.

Anyway, appreciate the mention!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, thanks for the writeup. Yes, I&#8217;m a believer that anything can be explained in simple, everyday terms. If something is presented in a complicated way, it&#8217;s often because the explainer doesn&#8217;t understand it well enough. Also there&#8217;s a need to empathize with your audience &#8212; the Wikipedia entry is factually accurate, but way too detailed for 99% of the intended audience. Unfortunately most topics (especially math) are explained as expert-to-expert, not expert-to-beginner.</p>
<p>Anyway, appreciate the mention!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
